|
How
is Bad Quality Promoted?
There are
a variety of ways substandard, subtherapeutic and spurious drugs get promoted
in the market. These are some of the ways and consumers need to watch
out:
| 1)
|
By
ignoring basic manufacturing requirements as indicated above, that
is negligence, poor ethics and a "chalta hai" (will-do)
attitude. |
| |
|
| 2) |
By making drugs at the lower end of the tolerance limit allowed: A
500 mg paracetamol tablet would be passed in quality control if it
has the active ingredient between 450 to 550 mg (plus/minus 10%).
During its shelf life the 450 mg tablet's
potency may decrease and may not act as desired. |
| |
|
| 3) |
By inappropriate packing: for instance, water absorbing drugs like
aspirin and ethambutol should be protected from high humidity during
manufacture and storage during the entire life of the drug. |
| |
|
| 4)
|
By
committing criminal acts like putting haldi powder (turmeric) for
tetracycline or sugar pill for calcium lactate. They harm the patients
by not acting at the time of need. Again careless manufacture in specially
IV fluids and injections have been known to kill. |
| |
|
| 5) |
By
consciously putting unnecessary products in the market and claiming
undue benefits for them. (This can happen with essential drugs also
when companies claim benefits not warranted by scientific research).
Some addictive substances like alcohol may be added in tonics, and
the tonic as a whole is then claimed to be a stimulant. Or promoting
substances that are sedatives but have the side-effect of increasing
appetite; the drug is then marketed as an appetite stimulant.
|
| |
|
| 6) |
By trying to bribe drug and other officials, and succeeding in evading
compliance of desirable manufacturing practices. Also trying to bribe/induce
doctors to prescribe one's
own products, by influencing medical college departments for favourable
research reports, by denying the efficacy of cheaper and safer alternatives,
bad quality is ultimately promoted in the system. Everybody loses
in the process. |
| |
|
| 7) |
By
trying to come into the market for short-term purposes only: say,
merely to fulfill an export order or a government order of, say,
Rs. 10 crores. This can be done by loan licence manufacture and
then disappearing (the so-called fly-by-night syndrome). Every manufacturer
has an obligation to disclose sources and uses of funds, balance
sheets, details about promoters and who is behind the company. In
short, manufacturers need to be accountable to the public.
|
| |
Drug Promotion:
Unethical Methods
As pharmaceutical
business is very profitable, it is hardly any wonder that pharmaceutical
companies spend atleast 20 per cent of their sales revenue on promoting
their products (10).
Drug promotion
is carried out by means of heavy advertising, frequent visits to private
medical practitioners by the medical representatives of pharmaceutical
companies with literature on their drugs, free sample of drugs, and even
blatant bribes like diaries, posters, calendars, pens, or other gifts,
and sometimes also invitations to medical conferences held in five-star
hotels with lavish meals and expensive give-aways. The companies also
encourage articles in newspapers and magazines, television and radio programmes,
release promotional materials as news stories about latest developments
in medical field and sponsoring television programmes. Thus, drug promotion
is a comprehensive attempt to influence health workers and the general
public to suspend their critical judgment (11).
In developing countries, pharmaceutical companies engage in such aggressive
marketing that there is a higher ratio of sales representatives to doctors,
approximately one representative for every 7 doctors in Bangladesh; 1:4
in Tanzania; 1:3 in Nepal and Brazil, while in Britain it is only 1:18
(12). In the absence of objective information on new drugs, doctors in
many Third World countries, are fully dependent on drug information supplied
by the pharmaceutical companies. And owing to the profit-oriented nature
of the drug companies, the information provided in its literature is bound
to be in favour of the drug.
|